USA and immigration schizophrenia

Published 2025-10-02

tag(s): #random-thoughts #politics

I was born and raised in Argentina, lived there until my 30s. We almost pride ourselves in being a land of contradictions. I take this as giving me some "insider knowledge" to point out contradictions in culture and social discourse for other places. 😎
Here follows a handy guide to "name" your cultural background, from a real immigrant.
I will also point out that overly categorizing things is a very American trait. The need to put everything in a box, reducing a textured reality full of gradients to a single word or group.

"I am a (something)-American"

  1. Were you born in another country?
  2. Did you come to the USA as a kid? or at most a pre-teen?
If yes to both, congratulations! You get to use the demonym of that other country plus "American", if you feel so inclined.
My son came to the US when he was 8 months old. He is argentinian: was born in Argentina, and grew up in a household of Argentinian parents and customs.
He will definitely be influenced by US culture too, which of course we are embracing by staying here (I mean, we are citizens!).
But yeah, the cultural influence of the country of origin of his parents is very much present in his life.
So that duality is kind of OK....kind of, because...

A few years ago, in school, when talking about this, someone said he is "Argentinian-American". I thought, and still think, this is reductive in one case, and wrong in another.
Literally, he was born in Argentina, From that point of view, he is Argentinian.
But he also spent most of his life in the US. I think calling him Argentinian-American, putting the country he was born in over the one in which he grew up, where he is spending his formative years, is...mmmm...I don't want to say wrong. Like I said earlier, reductive.

There's also the fact that not everyone who grows up in an immigrant household goes through the same experience. I've seen siblings, under the same roof, and with little age difference, really connected to their parent's culture in one case and completely ignore it in the other.
Here comes into play what I said in the intro: can't reduce all immigrants to a pair of demonyms, everyone has their own journey.

In any other case: you are "American".

Let's say my son decides to have kids. And he still lives in the US.
I would love if in this scenario, my grandkids are connected to Argentinian culture. Speak rioplatense Spanish, use the word "football" when referring to soccer, and drink mate. And maybe they do, and maybe they don't care.
In either case...they would be American.

They would be born here in the US, to parents at least once removed from another country and culture. So, they would be American. There is nothing wrong about this, it is a fact of life.

I find it, honestly, dumb and maybe cringe, when someone claims to be Irish-American, or Italian-American, or Japanese-American, but they are like five generations removed from their immigrant ancestors.
You can be connected to a cultural heritage, but at that point, it is a real stretch to make it part of your identity to put it in front of "American".

In principle, I don't care

Of course, you are free to call yourself whatever you want. You are not bothering anyone by it, knock yourself out!
I feel and behave the same about a lot of other things. You want to identify as gay, member of X or Y religion, transgender, libertarian, communist or furry. I really don't mind. I would like for your to be able to do so in the open, and to live your best life being...a furry. Or French-American. Or whatever.

As long as everyone has the same freedom, we can all coexist[1] in the same place, and not impose things on others, I am all for it.

But you can't have it both ways

I can't stand double standards.
For example, you can't seriously fly (for example) an Irish flag next to an American flag in your front porch and then use hateful rhetoric when talking about immigration. Even I know, and I haven't studied that much American history, that Irish who emigrated here in the early 20th century faced a lot of discrimination. And same for most if not all ethnic groups.

If you are so connected to your immigrant ancestors, you would know how hard emigrating is. Even if you do it out of choice, it is still a very difficult one, and that isn't taken lightly.
So you should be able to see immigrants today through that lens, and identify their plight and willingness to seek a better future for themselves and their families.

Yes, I generalized, so if you think I am being unfair to you, a 4th generation and proud German-American, who loves all immigrants, I am genuinely sorry.
But at the same time, about half of the US voted for the anti-immigrant hate rhetoric, so my comments here apply to a good chunk of people. And you know it, dear reader.

And in the case of those people, I find the idea that they identify as XYZ-American, and they are cheering for the way immigration matters are currently being handled...baffling. To put it mildly.

One thing for a future post...

The way latinos are singled out is particularly hilarious to me, on two levels.
First, because a lot of the current economy is sustainable only thanks to their presence and the fact that so many are undocumented and have no rights or legal protections .
Second, because in a country with places named "Montana"[2], "Conejos", and "Los Angeles", this seems like a battle lost a long, long, long time ago. The USA has been heavily latino influenced for longer than many would like to admit.

But I prefer shorter posts. So maybe I will expand on these another day.

Footnotes
  1. I really hate that this word has been usurped by those cringe "coexist" bumper stickers...
  2. Obviously, "Montaña", mountain..

Share your thoughts (via email)

Back to top

Back to homepage